<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alert Blog Reviews &#187; director</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whitealert.com/tag/director/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whitealert.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Twitter’s App Nest Is Big and Growing</title>
		<link>http://www.whitealert.com/social-media/twitter%e2%80%99s-app-nest-is-big-and-growing</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitealert.com/social-media/twitter%e2%80%99s-app-nest-is-big-and-growing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cgseo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris-twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform-ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitealert.com/uncategorized/twitter%e2%80%99s-app-nest-is-big-and-growing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ At the LeWeb conference in Paris Twitter is busy making sure that all the developments in the real-time search and social media world aren’t just coming from the Googleplex. Maybe it’s the end of the year rush or it’s the need to create excitement going into 2010 since 2009 was a rough year for many. Whatever the reason the news is fast and furious inthe space in general. Twitter’s busy letting the world in on the sheer volume of apps that have been developed for the service and how they are going to help foster more growth in the near future. TechCrunch is convering the event and tells us Twitter’s Director of Platform Ryan Sarver just took the stage at LeWeb a couple of minutes ago, and shared some announcements with the audience about the future of the platform and the effect this will have on the ecosystem. He also shared a milestone for the company: Sarver said 50,000 registered applications to date have been built using Twitter APIs. The roadmap ahead: Transparency : “we need to be more public about our policy and intentions” Communication : “we need to be out there and let our developers know what’s going on” Utility : “we need to keep providing our robust APIs and enable third-party developers to thrive” Profitability : “when our partners succeed, we succeed” (more details coming early 2010) Of course, since this is Twitter most people will laser in on the P word (profitability). Some of the significant ‘details’ around these areas is that everyone will have full access to the data stream in 2010 (what that actually means is TBD). Look for a new website for developers with dashboards and the like for the development community. Also, as a sign that the development of apps is truly a big deal there will be a Twitter developer conference in 2010 called Chirp in San Francisco next year The conference, which will be geared towards developers, is likely to be similar in some ways to Facebook’s F8 conference that is held each year in San Francisco. Not too many details were given but there is a landing page up already for the event (which is scheduled to take place sometime in 2010). So Twitter continues to flourish and develop to try to handle the continued growth despite some concern about visitor fall off recently. I suspect that some of the developers are the very reason for this ‘concern’ as many people access Twitter through third party apps to begin with and those growing numbers are not tracked by these number crunching entities. Looks like 2010 is going to be another big year for Twitter. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> At the LeWeb conference in Paris Twitter is busy making sure that all the developments in the real-time search and social media world aren’t just coming from the Googleplex. Maybe it’s the end of the year rush or it’s the need to create excitement going into 2010 since 2009 was a rough year for many. Whatever the reason the news is fast and furious inthe space in general. Twitter’s busy letting the world in on the sheer volume of apps that have been developed for the service and how they are going to help foster more growth in the near future. TechCrunch is convering the event and tells us Twitter’s Director of Platform Ryan Sarver just took the stage at LeWeb a couple of minutes ago, and shared some announcements with the audience about the future of the platform and the effect this will have on the ecosystem. He also shared a milestone for the company: Sarver said 50,000 registered applications to date have been built using Twitter APIs. The roadmap ahead: Transparency : “we need to be more public about our policy and intentions” Communication : “we need to be out there and let our developers know what’s going on” Utility : “we need to keep providing our robust APIs and enable third-party developers to thrive” Profitability : “when our partners succeed, we succeed” (more details coming early 2010) Of course, since this is Twitter most people will laser in on the P word (profitability). Some of the significant ‘details’ around these areas is that everyone will have full access to the data stream in 2010 (what that actually means is TBD). Look for a new website for developers with dashboards and the like for the development community. Also, as a sign that the development of apps is truly a big deal there will be a Twitter developer conference in 2010 called Chirp in San Francisco next year The conference, which will be geared towards developers, is likely to be similar in some ways to Facebook’s F8 conference that is held each year in San Francisco. Not too many details were given but there is a landing page up already for the event (which is scheduled to take place sometime in 2010). So Twitter continues to flourish and develop to try to handle the continued growth despite some concern about visitor fall off recently. I suspect that some of the developers are the very reason for this ‘concern’ as many people access Twitter through third party apps to begin with and those growing numbers are not tracked by these number crunching entities. Looks like 2010 is going to be another big year for Twitter. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.whitealert.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/3c3b757d57button.gif.gif" /></p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/twitters-app-nest-is-big-and-growing.html" title="Twitter’s App Nest Is Big and Growing">Twitter’s App Nest Is Big and Growing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitealert.com/social-media/twitter%e2%80%99s-app-nest-is-big-and-growing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Price of One Anonymous Comment? Your Job</title>
		<link>http://www.whitealert.com/legal/the-price-of-one-anonymous-comment-your-job</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitealert.com/legal/the-price-of-one-anonymous-comment-your-job#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dictate-the-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenbaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitealert.com/uncategorized/the-price-of-one-anonymous-comment-your-job</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Most of us have blogs, right? How do you react to anonymous vulgar comments? Hit SPAM, right? Yeah, me too. And so did the Director of Social Media for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch Kurt Greenbaum. The first time. But when the anonymous commenter again posted the single-word vulgarity, Greenbaum tracked his IP address&#8212;to a school. Probably thinking he was reporting a misbehaving student, Greenbaum contacted the school and explained the situation. Six hours later, the school called back: they&#8217;d found the commenter&#8212;an employee. After they confronted him, the employee resigned. Most of us probably have an intrinsic notion that the anonymous commenter and Greenbaum both acted inappropriately (although there was no way for Greenbaum to know he was turning in an employee and not a student)&#8212;but perhaps the more important question is whether they were acting legally. Greenbaum, a Post-Dispatch employee, should be bound by the paper&#8217;s online privacy policy, which states: We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. However, at the beginning of the policy, they stipulate that &#8220;Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.&#8221; So is that individual user information? Sounds like it&#8217;s not. And the Post-Dispatch&#8217;s ToS is an exercise in CYA (they define &#8220;submission&#8221; to include comments): You automatically waive any claim that any use of such content violates any of your rights, including privacy rights, publicity rights, moral rights or any other right, including the right to approve the way we use such content. You are responsible for the content of all Submissions and acknowledge that third parties may hold you responsible for content related claims including libel, invasion of privacy, misappropriation of likeness and disclosure of confidential information. You shall indemnify, defend and hold us, our parent company and our affiliated entities (including our officers, directors, owners, agents and employees) harmless from all liability and costs incurred by those indemnified in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you of the above representations and warranties and for any claims related to the content or your Submissions. And, naturally, the ToS stipulates that using the site to &#8220;upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available content that is harmful to minors in any way, or that is harassing, harmful, threatening, abusive, vulgar, obscene, defamatory, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable&#8221; violates the ToS, too. And how were Anon&#8217;s actions illegal? Well, setting aside possible obscenity charges (while legally problematic, &#8220;obscenity&#8221; is not protected under the First Amendment), the school probably also has policies&#8212;policies that dictate the use of school resources. Most likely, this comment was made on school time, from a school computer, using the school&#8217;s Internet connection. Somehow, I can&#8217;t imagine there&#8217;s a provision in the policy that allows for use of school resources for posting vulgar comments online. By violating these policies, the employee could face discipline or even termination. What do you think? Would these policies hold up in court? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Most of us have blogs, right? How do you react to anonymous vulgar comments? Hit SPAM, right? Yeah, me too. And so did the Director of Social Media for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch Kurt Greenbaum. The first time. But when the anonymous commenter again posted the single-word vulgarity, Greenbaum tracked his IP address&mdash;to a school. Probably thinking he was reporting a misbehaving student, Greenbaum contacted the school and explained the situation. Six hours later, the school called back: they&#8217;d found the commenter&mdash;an employee. After they confronted him, the employee resigned. Most of us probably have an intrinsic notion that the anonymous commenter and Greenbaum both acted inappropriately (although there was no way for Greenbaum to know he was turning in an employee and not a student)&mdash;but perhaps the more important question is whether they were acting legally. Greenbaum, a Post-Dispatch employee, should be bound by the paper&#8217;s online privacy policy, which states: We will not share individual user information with third parties unless the user has specifically approved the release of that information. However, at the beginning of the policy, they stipulate that &#8220;Your IP address does not contain personally identifiable information, nor does it identify you personally.&#8221; So is that individual user information? Sounds like it&#8217;s not. And the Post-Dispatch&#8217;s ToS is an exercise in CYA (they define &#8220;submission&#8221; to include comments): You automatically waive any claim that any use of such content violates any of your rights, including privacy rights, publicity rights, moral rights or any other right, including the right to approve the way we use such content. You are responsible for the content of all Submissions and acknowledge that third parties may hold you responsible for content related claims including libel, invasion of privacy, misappropriation of likeness and disclosure of confidential information. You shall indemnify, defend and hold us, our parent company and our affiliated entities (including our officers, directors, owners, agents and employees) harmless from all liability and costs incurred by those indemnified in connection with any claim arising out of any breach by you of the above representations and warranties and for any claims related to the content or your Submissions. And, naturally, the ToS stipulates that using the site to &#8220;upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available content that is harmful to minors in any way, or that is harassing, harmful, threatening, abusive, vulgar, obscene, defamatory, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable&#8221; violates the ToS, too. And how were Anon&#8217;s actions illegal? Well, setting aside possible obscenity charges (while legally problematic, &#8220;obscenity&#8221; is not protected under the First Amendment), the school probably also has policies&mdash;policies that dictate the use of school resources. Most likely, this comment was made on school time, from a school computer, using the school&#8217;s Internet connection. Somehow, I can&#8217;t imagine there&#8217;s a provision in the policy that allows for use of school resources for posting vulgar comments online. By violating these policies, the employee could face discipline or even termination. What do you think? Would these policies hold up in court? </p>
<p><img src="http://www.whitealert.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/3c3b757d57button.gif.gif" /></p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/the-price-of-one-anonymous-comment-your-job.html" title="The Price of One Anonymous Comment? Your Job">The Price of One Anonymous Comment? Your Job</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitealert.com/legal/the-price-of-one-anonymous-comment-your-job/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

