Posts tagged ‘application’

I’ve posted before about how certain features can improve your twitter experience. These required a lot of research. After reading hundreds of blog posts, I’ve gained a new appreciation of twitter applications.  One of them is The T wit Cleaner. I primarily use the web interface. I leave tweetdeck on when I’m busy but I’ll use the web to really dive into conversations. I follow over 1000 and,  despite being really picky with my return follows, started to find my friends where getting drowned out. I needed help but didn’t want to spend hours manually going through my list. This is where The Twit Cleaner literally saved my twitter stream. What is the twit cleaner? The Twit Cleaner i s an app by @sidawson that is designed to help clean out your twitter account. According to the FAQ , “it gets your following list, then analyses the profiles & tweets of every single one of those people, looking for certain patterns of behaviour (people not talking, being over repetitive, posting the same links repeatedly, etc).” I’ve run this a couple of times and, frankly, its awesome. Note: The account @twitcleaner isn’t associated with this – you have to make sure to @reply thetwitcleaner . How does it work? The whole process is really simple. First, you have to click the button to request your report. Note that there is a box which, if left checked, will send out a tweet telling your friends about The Twit Cleaner . You are under no obligation to tweet anything. You will then get shown a pop up asking if the application has your permission to access your account. This is safe. I have many friends that develop apps and they only need the information to give you the information you need. You will shortly get sent a DM linking to your report. There is an example report on the about page . Yours will look different and some of the names have changed. Thats cool. That picture was designed to help you understand it better. The report will contain a list of potentially dodgy accounts. Now – just because someone is on a list, doesn’t mean that they are dodgy. I will explain this further, but it just means that they fall into a certain category of behaviors. The main categories are: Dodgy – spam phrases, @ spamming, duplicate links etc Absent – No updates in a month, or fewer than 10 tweets. Repetitive – High numbers of duplicate tweets or links Flooding – So high volume you can’t see anyone else Non-Responsive – No interaction & those that follow back < 10% Everyone is free to use twitter in their own way. Not all of these behaviors are bad. Some people are travelling and thus aren’t on twitter for an extended period of time. Some people use the platform primarily to broadcast. The Twit Cleaner organizes people into subcategories so you can easily choose who you want to unfollow. In my summary, I have a section saything ‘These accounts ignore you.’ Within that, users fall into 3 subcategories. Hardly follow anyone Don’t interact with anyone Have fewer than 10 tweets. Each section is broken up like this. Based on the report, it is really easy to make a decision about who you want to unfollow. This process is really easy. There are two options. You can use the data to manually unfollow people or you can let The Twit Cleaner do it for you. You are given four options: Only unfollow those I don’t select Unfollow the spammy and absent, keep the rest Unfollow the spammy, keep the rest Unfollow the absent, keep the rest. I suggest you use whatever option feels right for you. I always choose to unfollow the users I don’t select. This is time consuming but ensures you don’t accidentally unfollow people. Selecting someone is easy. You just have to click their avatar. Their icon will show up as shaded and that person wont be unfollowed. How much does it cost? Surprisingly, the report itself is free. There is a small charge if your total follow count is over 2000. The prices are: Up to 25,000 – $5 USD Up to 50,000 – $10 USD Otherwise – $20 USD These are very reasonable prices considering what you get. Mini Interview with Si Dawson I was fascinated by this application and so, took the opportunity to ask Si a few questions about The Twit Cleaner . I hope this gives you an insight to what goes on behind the scenes of 1. This was super easy and really thorough. Why did you choose to offer it for free instead of charging? The report is always free. I do charge a small sum if you follow more than 2000 people & want to get us to auto-unfollow for you. 90% of twitter users follow fewer than 2000 people, so for the vast majority of people, the entire process is free. For larger lists, I figured once people saw how useful the report was & how much time it would save them, they’d be happy to pay. The charge is primarily to cover costs on larger reports. For people with massive lists (20k+) it can take literally hours on a quad processor box to do all that analysis. I did have one report that ran for three days. It’s a LOT of work. 2. How much work went into creating and maintaining the twit cleaner? I’d say I’ve spent somewhere in the order of 1500 hours to date. Eg, last night I worked until 5am, & was up again at 9 to deal with tech support issues, minor hiccups etc. That goes on seven days a week. It’s pretty full on. 3. How does using this application improve your twitter experience? I designed it because I tried some auto-follow tools (keyword following, that sort of thing) & quickly start to dread looking at Twitter. There was so much noise, so much junk. The Twit Cleaner categorises everyone you’re following into common groupings – people that just post links, people that never talk to anyone. Those that are just blasting noise out, & not authentically engaging with anyone, oh, & the pure out spammers, & so on. So, by seeing these groupings, it then becomes very easy to go “You know what? I’m actually not interested in following that kind of person.” In my case, I got rid of all the spammers, the link feeds & so on. When I got up the next morning I looked at Twitter, & suddenly it was -interesting- again. It went from 90% noise to 90% interesting stuff. Stuff I liked, information that was interesting to me. It was always there, but I just couldn’t see it because of all the crap. My follow list dropped by about 30% but my enjoyment went up 500%! 4. Do you plan to create more apps that will help the twitter community? I have a couple more apps in the imediate pipeline, yes. Obviously there are some bits of the site that are still a bit average. The functionality is good on the report, for example, but the UI needs to be slicked up quite a lot. So, there’s that. The other things is this – calling in The Twit Cleaner is kind of an emergency situation. Things have gone mad, & you need to get them back under control again. Wouldn’t it be better to not need it in the first place? So, one app (which I already have early beta versions of, but isn’t quite ready for public rollout), is a clean followback – which follows anyone that follows you, but filters them according to the algorithms (so you’ll never follow any spammers). Another is clean keyword searching. So, following people that use certain keywords – all very common already – but again, filtered by the algorithms. You’ll be able to choose which categories you’re interested in following or not. Using these two give you all the power to grow your list & respond to the community, but keep it clean & high value at the same time. I have some even more exciting stuff I’ve been testing out, but it’s too early to talk about that just yet. Suffice to say, it’ll completely revolutionise finding quality people on Twitter. I’m very excited about it. Over to you: Have you used any applications to clean up your twitter account? What was your experience like? Also, if you have any questions about The Twit Cleaner just leave them in the comments. Disclosure: The developer, Si Dawson , is a friend of mine. However I didn’t know that he created this, or that he was a coder, until after using the service. © 2008 TwiTip Twitter Tips . Review of The Twit Cleaner

Read the original:
Review of The Twit Cleaner

It’s been more than two years since Google’s last big big to enter a government-regulated offline business. They offered some $4.6B for wireless spectrum in an auction in 2008, but it seemed that the multi-billion bid was merely a ploy to get some of their demands for the spectrum met. But that’s not quite the case with Google’s recent application to buy and sell power “much like utility companies do,” according to the New York Times . Google told the Federal Energy Regulation Commission that they need this capability to support their power-hungry facilities with more renewable energy sources. Google created a subsidiary last month, Google Energy, to handle this. As the NYT points out, this isn’t Google’s first look at energy: This is hardly Google’s first foray into the energy world. Over the years, Google has invested in renewable energy projects through its philanthropic and venture capital units. It has also embarked on a number of engineering projects and partnerships to, for example, advance plug-in hybrids and offer tools to measure home electricity usage. And it has an ambitious goal to help develop renewable energy that is cheaper than coal. Bill Weihl, Google’s green energy czar, discussed many of those initiatives and goals in a lengthy interview with The New York Times published on Thursday. Google insists that they’re not getting into the market to trade energy, but if their application is approved, they could sell any surplus energy they own. What do you think? Is this just Google’s carbon-neutrality quest, or a back-door entry into another market?

Go here to see the original:
Google Applies to Enter Energy Market

Last year I consulted with a local TV affiliate that wanted to build a localized social network. Part of the plan was to equip citizen journalists so that they could record and upload videos of news stories relevant to their town or county. We would have killed for the new YouTube Direct tool just launched by Google. Built from our APIs, this open source application lets media organizations enable customized versions of YouTube’s upload platform on their own websites. Users can upload videos directly into this application, which also enables the hosting organization to easily review video submissions and select the best ones to broadcast on-air and on their websites. As always, these videos also live on YouTube, so users can reach their own audience while also getting broader exposure and editorial validation for the videos they create. Of course, this is not just limited to news organizations. Any business, blogger, or nonprofit that wants to solicit user-generated video is going to find a way to use YouTube Direct. In fact, Google reports that ABC News , the Huffington Post , NPR , Politico , the San Francisco Chronicle , the Washington Post and WHDH-TV/WLVI-TV in Boston are already using YouTube Direct. What you need to know: Built on the YouTube API, this 100% open-source solution provides you with an easily-integrated audience engagement platform for your website The customizable interface allows you to tailor the look and feel of the tool precisely to your audience Visitors can answer your call for content by uploading their videos to YouTube via your site without leaving the page A moderation panel enables your editors to review and approve/reject all submitted videos, deciding which ones meet your organization’s editorial criteria All videos approved by your editors include a link back to your site when viewed on YouTube You can also learn more from this YouTube video–how appropriate:

View original post here:
YouTube Directs Citizen Journalists to Upload Videos to Your Site

Twitter spam and phishing attacks are on the rise, which is unfortunate because it’s causing a lot of people to lose friends, often times unknowingly. For instance, last night I received nearly 25 spammy DM’s, all of which were from people that I don’t talk with on a regular basis. It left me in an awkward position because I didn’t have time to DM them all back to give them an update, but I knew that most of them were probably losing followers by the hour. It all started with auto DM’s and Mafia Wars games. People would sign up, give access to the application, and then it would DM spam every one of their followers until either they all unfollowed them or they removed the application. From there, it moved to more sophisticated attacks, such as the recent “Hey, is this you?” type of messages. There’s also the “hey, check out this I.Q. quiz thingy.” Although the links might seem harmless, they are actually bait to get you to click the link, give up your info, and then let your account be used against your will in the same way as before. In the future, you can expect things to get worse, that is unless you do something about it. That’s why I want to educate you here, because it’s spam like this that can open your account to virus attacks, malware, or worse. 1. Don’t click DM links unless they are from someone that you talk to often or that you trust won’t fall prey to these attacks. If you see the same message over and over again, it’s a phisher. If you aren’t sure, then send a DM back and ask about the message. Most of the time, they won’t even know they sent one. 2. Check your outbound DM’s on a daily basis to make sure you aren’t spamming people. If you are, head to the next step. 3. If you do find your account compromised, then change your password immediately. In fact, it’s good practice to change your password often to avoid things like this. If your account does become compromised, it’s possible that you might lose access completely. If this happens, you’ll either have to appeal to Twitter to save your account…or you’ll have to start over from scratch. 4. Check your application preferences to see who you’ve allowed to access your account. Click on Settings -> connections to get that menu. If you can’t tell who’s using your account to spam others, then remove each one and start over. Only give access to programs you trust. Only use applications that use OAuth to access the Twitter API. If you don’t see it, then go elsewhere. The problem with Twitter spam is that it often kills someone’s credibility and unless someone is kind enough to tell you that you are spamming them, you’ll see your follow counts dwindle without a clue as to why. The best way to protect yourself is just to be smart and use common sense. If you see someone caught in a spam attack, let them know before you drop them. If that doesn’t work, then kindly move on. Remember, if the link looks suspicious, then it probably is. © 2008 TwiTip Twitter Tips . Spam, Phishing, and Hacks – How to Shore Up Your Defenses

Read this article:
Spam, Phishing, and Hacks – How to Shore Up Your Defenses